Fecha/hora: 01/06/2024 01:44:51

Biblioteca(s): 	INIA Treinta y Tres.	
Tipo de la producción científica: 	Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales	
Circulación/Nivel: 	Internacional - --	
Fecha corriente: 	31/07/2018	
Fecha de la última actualización: 	11/10/2019	
Autoria: 	DOSTER, E.; ROVIRA, P.J.; NOYES, N.R.; BURGESS, B. A.; YANG, X.; WEINROTH, M.D.; LAKIN, S.M.; DEAN, C.J.; LINKE, L.; MAGNUSON, R.; JONES, K.I.; BOUCHER, C.; RUIZ, J.; BELK, K.E.; MORLEY, P.S.	
Afiliación: 	ENRIQUE DOSTER, Microbial Ecology Group, Colorado State University, USA. Department of Microbiology, Inmunology and Pathology, Colorado State University. USA.; PABLO JUAN ROVIRA SANZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. Microbial Ecology Group, Colorado State University. Department of Microbiology, Imnunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, USA.; NOELLE R. NOYES., Microbial Ecology Group, Colorado State University. Department of Veterinary Population Medicine, University of Minnesota.; BRANDY A. BURGESS, Department of Population Health, University of Georgia, USA.; XIANG YANG, Microbial Ecology Group, Colorado State University. Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, USA.; MARGARET D. WEINROTH, Microbial Ecology Group, Colorado State University. Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, USA.; STEVEN M. LAKIN, Microbial Ecology Group, Colorado State University. Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, USA.; CHRISTOPHER J. DEAN, Microbial Ecology Group, Colorado State University. Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, USA.; LYNDSEY LINKE, Department of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, USA.; ROBERTA MAGNUSON, Department of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, USA.; KENNETH I. JONES, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Colorado, USA.; CHRISTINA BOUCHER, Department of Computer and Information Science and Engineering, University of Florida, USA.; JAMIE RUIZ, Department of Computer and Information Science and Engineering, University of Florida, USA.; KEITH E. BELK, Microbial Ecology Group, Colorado State University. Department of Microbiology, Imnunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, USA.; PAUL S. MORLEY, Microbial Ecology Group, Colorado State University, USA. Department of Microbiology, Inmunology and Pathology, Colorado State University. USA.	
Título: 	Investigating effects of tulathromycin metaphylaxis on the fecal resistome and microbiome of commercial feedlot cattle early in the feeding period.	
Año de publicación: 	2018	
Fuente/Imprenta: 	Frontier in Microbiology, 2018, 9:1715.	
Páginas: 	14 p.	
DOI: 	10.3389/fmicb.2018.01715	
Idioma: 	Inglés	
Notas: 	Article history: Received: 14 April 2018;  Accepted: 09 July 2018;  Published: 30 July 2018.
Open Access journal.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01715	
Contenido: 	The objective was to examine effects of treating commercial beef feedlot cattle with therapeutic doses of tulathromycin, a macrolide antimicrobial drug, on changes in the fecal resistome and microbiome using shotgun metagenomic sequencing. Two pens of cattle were used, with all cattle in one pen receiving metaphylaxis treatment (800 mg subcutaneous tulathromycin) at arrival to the feedlot, and all cattle in the other pen remaining unexposed to parenteral antibiotics throughout the study period. Fecal samples were collected from 15 selected cattle in each group just prior to treatment (Day 1), and again 11 days later (Day 11). Shotgun sequencing was performed on isolated metagenomic DNA, and reads were aligned to a resistance and a taxonomic database to identify alignments to antimicrobial resistance (AMR) gene accessions and microbiome content. Overall, we identified AMR genes accessions encompassing 9 classes of AMR drugs and encoding 24 unique AMR mechanisms. Statistical analysis was used to identify differences in the resistome and microbiome between the untreated and treated groups at both timepoints, as well as over time. Based on composition and ordination analyses, the resistome and microbiome were not significantly different between the two groups on Day 1 or on Day 11. However, both the resistome and microbiome changed significantly between these two sampling dates. These results indicate that the transition into the feedlot?and associated changes in diet, geography, conspecific exposure, and environment?may exert a greater influence over the fecal resistome and microbiome of feedlot cattle than common metaphylactic antimicrobial drug treatment.	
Palabras-Clave: 	METAGENOMICS; METAPHYLAXIS; MICROBIOME; RESISTOME; TULATHROMYCIN.	
Thesagro: 	BOVINOS; FEEDLOT.	
Categoría del tema: 	L73 Enfermedades de los animales	
URL: 	http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/10933/1/fmicb-09-01715.pdf	
Registro original: 	INIA Treinta y Tres (TT)	
Ejemplares: 	TT - (102411-1) - PXI - AP - DD - PP/FRONTIER-IN-MICROBIOLOGY-2018 -  - 2018-Rov-2 - DIS